The idea of requiring all students at the precollege level to learn something about computers (to begin to build a solid foundation in Information and Communication Technology) has been around for a great many years. In 1982, Art Luehrmann wrote: “Should the computer teach the student, or vice-versa?" The article discusses computer literacy. Quoting Art Luehrmann:
Mass computing literacy is not an agreed-upon educational goal. Today very few courses at any educational level show students how to use computing as an intellectual tool with applications to the subject matter being taught. Oh, there are a few isolated, subject-matter-free courses in computer programming; but their market is largely restricted to vocational-education students, at one end of the spectrum, and future computer professionals at the other. It is true that most schools consider it prestigious to have a large and powerful computer facility; but the fact of the matter is that such computers are usually the captives of research and administrative interests and operate on a pay-as-you-go basis. Ironically, it is in the most prestigious universities that students are least likely to be permitted to use those prestigious computers. It is a rare secondary school, college, or university that budgets and operates its computer facility in the same way that it budgets and operates its library.… In the main, literacy in computing simply is not an educational goal at many schools. Most educators seem to find bizarre the suggestion that accreditation agencies examine schools for the quality of their educational computing facilities, just as they now do with libraries. (Find this quote and learn more about Art Luehrmann at http://iae-pedia.org/Arthur_Luehrmann.)
The 1983 report, “A Nation at Risk” (http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html) includes the statement: