Subscribe to this Blog

Enter your email address:

Information Age Education Blog

A short description about your blog
Nov 01
2010

Think Globally, Act Locally

Posted by: Dave Moursund

Tagged in: Sustainability

The title of this IAE Blog entry is a widely used phrase that can be traced back to the late 1960s or early 1970s and has an environmental focus. An alternate title for this IAE Blog entry is, “Consider both the big picture and the small picture when making decisions and taking actions.”

We are all born egocentric. Through a combination of nature and nurture, we become more sociocentric. Most children eventually learn that they are not the center of the universe. They learn to take other people and the longer term view into consideration as they make decisions and take actions.

The rate of progress in becoming more sociocentric varies considerably among children, and it certainly depends on the environment in which they are raised. Many adults have trouble understanding the idea of “Think globally, act locally.”

Here is a general example that should interest all of you. Tomorrow (November 2, 2010) is Election Day in the United States. You have undoubtedly read about and listened to candidates talking about big issues such as sustainability, education, the economy, and poverty. You have also heard the same candidates talk about what might be considered to be rather petty local topics, ones often chosen to be inflammatory and attention getting. I view this situation as the candidates being torn between trying to solve the problem of getting elected and at the same time being able to show that they are aware of the “big picture” issues and want to help solve them.

Our informal and formal educational systems have the opportunity to play a significant role in helping students become more sociocentric. Individual teachers are faced by the dual problems of dealing with a relatively fixed local curriculum that is to be taught, and their own insights into much larger problems in our world that their students will need to deal with as they more toward becoming responsible adult citizens.

The latter is a slippery pathway. Suppose that a teacher uses birthrate data from different countries or different ethnic and/or religious groups in a math course where the topic is data analysis and forecasting the future. The birthrate number of 2.1 comes us as a birthrate that eventually leads to a relatively stable population in a country with modern health care and little emigration or immigration. But the topic of birth control might come up in the discussion. Hmm. The teacher or the school principal could receive complaints from some parents or groups.

I found the following article to be informative:

Nolet, V. (2009). Preparing sustainability-literate teachers. Teachers College Record. Retrieved 11/1/2010 from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=15177.

Quoting from the article:

Background/Context: This article explores sustainability as an emerging paradigm for preservice preparation of teachers. Sustainability education, which is rooted in Deweyan ideas about the fundamental social purposes of schooling, attends to the tensions created by the interconnectedness of environmental, economic, and social equity systems. Sustainability education extends but does not replace environmental education or education for sustainable development, although the latter is considered a problematic idea.

Conclusions: Sustainability education represents a new paradigm for the preparation of teachers. It can help new teachers develop a curricular vision that addresses the fundamental social purposes of education in the context of an uncertain 21st century. Sustainability education also can stimulate a conversation about the role of teacher education in the creation and solution of global environmental and social justice challenges.

What You Can Do

You know that the message sent is not necessarily the message received. You, for example, have “constructed” a personal meaning to my message given above. My overall intent is to provide you with some information and ideas that you will act upon in a manner that leads to improving our informal and formal educational systems.

So, pause for a few seconds and think about the meaning you have constructed from my message and some possible action that you might take based on this meaning. What occurs to you that you, personally, will try out in your quest to improve  our educational system?

As a personal example, over the years I have gradually come to understand the idea of sustainability. This idea was certainly not part of my 20 or so years of formal education! I am pleased that it has gradually worked its way into our general media and into our educational system. I work to promote this movement.

Final Remarks

Spend a bit of time reflecting on what you have just read. How does the information fit in with your current knowledge, beliefs, and activities? How can you make use of the information to help improve our informal and formal educational systems? Who do you know that might benefit from reading this IAE Blog entry?

If the IAE Blog entries are useful to you, then consider signing up for a Free Subscription. (See the menu on the left side of the page). You will automatically receive email about new postings to the IAE Blog. Typically, there are about three new postings per week.

The IAE Blog entries tend to have a relatively long "shelf life." However, over time, the references tend to get out of date. You can help your fellow readers and IAE by adding a Comment that includes an up-to-date reference and its URL. Your Comment should include a couple of sentences summarizing the up-to date-information and ideas.

Suggested Readings from IAE and Other Publications

Education for now and the future.  IAE Newsletter - Issue 21, July, 2009. 

Mind, Brain, and Education. IAE Newsletter - Issue # 52 October, 2010.

 Optimism and pessimism: Understanding both sides of a possible change.

Steadily increasing world population is a steadily increasing problem in sustainability.

 

IAE

 

Comments (1)Add Comment
davem
A new ruling: Genes are not patentable in the United States.
written by Dave Moursund, November 01, 2010
Here is the first part of the article:

Akst, Jef (11/1/2010). Genes not patent-able. Naturally Selected. Retrieved 11/1/2010 from http://blog.the-scientist.com/...tshell-19/.

The US government announced on Friday (October 29) that researchers should not be able to patent genes because they are “products of nature.” This decision, which overturns the long-standing policy that genes are eligible for patents, could have a “huge impact on medicine and on the biotechnology industry,” according to the New York Times.

The controversy about whether or not to patent genes arose over a 1998 patent for the breast cancer gene BRCA1. According to a study published last May in the journal Genomics, the patent should never have been granted, since it allowed the patent holder, a biotech company called Myriad Genetics, to establish a US monopoly on genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. The latest action came in the form of a “friend-of-the-court” brief filed by the Department of Justice, and contradicts the long-time policy of the patent office and the National Institutes of Health.



This is, in my opinion, an excellent example of the issue of narrow-minded versus broad-minded thinking. I have trouble imagining how there was initial agreement to allow patenting of a gene.

Perhaps this is because of my math background. Progress in math is a worldwide endeavor and I believe it "belongs to the world." Imagine having to pay a royalty to make use of a theorem that someone else first proved.

Write comment

busy