This free Information Age Education Newsletter is written by David
Moursund and produced by Ken Loge. For more information, see the end of
this newsletter.
Defining Levels of Depth of ICT
Educational Uses
In 1997, I wrote a short article about first-order and second-order
uses of computer technology in education.
In brief summary, in each academic discipline Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) can be used to do some things we are
already able to do, but perhaps do them better or cheaper. This is
called amplification.
In each academic discipline, ICT can be used
to do some things that we were not able to do (or, to readily do at a
reasonable cost and in a reasonable amount of time). This is called
second-order use, or moving beyond amplification.
Looking Back

Douglas Engelbart is one of the leading
figures in the history of
Information and Communication Technology. Quoting from the Wikipedia:
He is best known for inventing the
computer mouse, as a pioneer of
human-computer interaction whose team developed hypertext, networked
computers, and precursors to GUIs; and as a committed and vocal
proponent of the development and use of computers and networks to help
cope with the world’s increasingly urgent and complex problems.
Forty years ago, Engelbart presented the general idea that computers
could facilitate groups of people working together, raising their
collective intelligence and making it possible for people to more
successfully attack major world problems such as pollution, famine,
disease, war, and sustainability.
Engelbart foresaw much higher levels
of ICT use than were possible 40 years ago, and he helped to develop
the computer systems that make such higher-level uses possible.
Looking at Current Times

The first UNIVAC computer
was delivered to the U.S. Census Bureau on
March 31, 1951. The commercial “mass production” of this computer from
1951 to 1958 resulted in the sale and delivery of a total of 46
computers.
Today’s microcomputers are well over a million
times as fast and cost less than 1/1,000 as much as the UNIVAC I. The
computer processing power in a typical cell phone is well over 200,000
times that of the UNIVAC I, and worldwide production of cell phones is
now about a billion per year.
We are all familiar with current
uses of ICT in communication, games, still and video photography, GPS
systems, and so on. We are familiar with desktop publication,
computer-assisted learning, and the Web. We can all give examples of
major changes that have been brought about by ICT uses in art,
business, the film industry, music, and so on.
In summary,
second level (beyond amplification) uses of ICT are now thoroughly
ingrained into our everyday lives. Some aspects of our everyday lives
have been changed much more than others by such uses of ICT. Cell
phones represent an area huge and continuing rapid change. Our overall
formal educational system represents an area of modest and slow change.
Let me give two examples to help illustrate.
- The general idea of computational thinking (http://iae-pedia.org/Computational_Thinking)
has not yet entered the curriculum. We do a very poor job in helping
students learn about the capabilities and limitations of ICT as an aid
to representing and helping to solve the types of problems that
students are studying in school.
- In the world outside of
formal schooling, we have broadly accepted the idea that a combination
of human brain and computer “brain” is an appropriate way to deal with
a broad and growing range of problems. See http://iae-pedia.org/Two_Brains_Are_Better_Than_One.
But, our school curriculum content and assessment systems are
especially weak in these areas. For example, very few students are
regularly assessed in an open ICT environment, in which they can freely
draw ICT resources as they demonstrate their knowledge and skills.
Looking into the
Future
The “beyond amplification”
article mentioned earlier in this document
looks only at two levels of ICT use. The previous section gives example
of second level uses and points out that our formal education system is
not adopting this second level nearly as rapidly other major parts of
our society.
Here are two questions well worthy of careful and deep thought.
- What is an appropriate definition of “third level” uses of
ICT? A
definition based partly on examples would be quite helpful.
- How might such third level uses be appropriately
integrated into our educational system?
Each academic discipline includes a growing collection of
data, information, knowledge, wisdom, and foresight (see http://iae-pedia.org/Minimalism_in_Education)
relating to identifying, representing, and solving problems within the
discipline. This also includes storing and sharing the results, and
working with people in other disciplines to make use of the results. It
is increasingly clear that many or most problems are interdisciplinary,
so working and sharing across disciplines is an essential aspect of
problem solving in our world. (Ask yourself: Since we know that most
problems are interdisciplinary, why is most of the school curriculum
strongly discipline specific?)
The total collection of human
knowledge is overwhelmingly large and growing very rapidly. Third Level
uses of ICT address this issue. Two examples are:
- The relatively new discipline of Knowledge and Data
Mining. See ACM’s special interest group in this area, at http://www.sigkdd.org/charter.php.
- Steadily improving smarter information retrieval systems.
Examples
include search engines that make use of information about the person
doing the searching, and information systems that store and provide
access to computer programs that can actually solve or help solve
problems. For example, we have long had computer algebra systems that
can solve a wide range of the problems students encounter in math up
through second year of higher education.
Our formal education
system has many goals. The problem-solving orientation described above
is but one of these goals. However, I believe that second and third
level uses of ICT as an aid to representing and solving both
discipline-specific and interdisciplinary problems should be a routine
part of the everyday curriculum in our schools.
The goal is straightforward. Quoting from earlier in this
document:
Forty years ago, Engelbart presented
the general idea that computers
could facilitate groups of people working together, raising their
collective intelligence and making it possible for people to more
successfully attack major world problems such as pollution, famine,
disease, war, and sustainability.
About Information Age
Education, Inc.
Information Age Education is a non-profit organization
dedicated to
improving education for learners of all ages throughout the world. IAE
is a project of the Science Factory, a 501(c)(3) science and technology
museum located in Eugene, Oregon. Current IAE activities include a Wiki
with address http://IAE-pedia.org,
a Website containing free books and articles at http://I-A-E.org,
and the free newsletter you are now reading.
To subscribe to this twice-a-month free newsletter and to see back
issues, go to http://i-a-e.org/iae-newsletter.html.
To change your address or cancel your subscription, click on the
“Manage your Subscription” link at the bottom of this email message.
UNIVAC I image above, courtesy of the Computer History Museum - http://www.computerhistory.org.