This free Information Age Education Newsletter is written by David
Moursund and produced by Ken Loge. For more information, see the end of
this newsletter.
"The future depends on what we do in the present.” (Mahatma Gandhi;
major political and spiritual leader of India and the Indian
independence movement; 1869—1948.)
I like to read futuristic science fiction books as well as less
speculative forecasts of the future. Recently I have been reading
Year
Million: Science at the Far Edge of Knowledge, a 2008 book edited by
Damien Broderick This is a collection of 15 speculations about what
life on earth might be like a million years from now. The articles are
written by a number of learned people.
Also recently, a number
of people used ISTE’s SIG Teacher Education distribution list to
respond to the following request from Tammy Vaught at Clemson
University:
I am working on reevaluating a class that teaches
pre-service teachers how to incorporate technology into their
classrooms. I want to update the class to reflect new technologies. If
you could send me a brief description of a new technology that you are
using or that your teachers are using that would be great. … The big
question is: What should new teachers know how to use?
Education for Now and the Future
I think of education in terms of preparing students for the lives that
they are currently facing and for the lives they will face in the
future. That is, education is for now and the future. If we are to
educate students for possible futures that they might face, we have to
have some insights into what these possible futures might be.
You
are familiar with issues concerning “sustainability” and whether
we are living at a time in which humans may be doing nearly irreparable
damage to the earth and many of its occupants. Thus, some of the
“million years in the future” articles question whether humans will
still be around a million years from now. Such articles tend to have a
strong focus on whether and/or how humans will deal with such current
problems as global warming, global epidemic diseases, pollution,
hunger, and over population. They point to the need for widespread
education, widespread involvement, and forward-looking leadership in
dealing with these current problems that are apt to have very long-term
consequences.
Thus, such very long-term and relatively
speculative forecasts of the future provide us with some insights about
what all students —including preservice and inservice teachers—should
be learning now.
Technology and Change
Viewed in a very broad sense, technological progress is the underlying
cause of the various sustainability problems mentioned in the previous
section. In this broad definition of technological progress, I include
the development of agriculture, reading and writing, math, science,
medicine, industrial manufacturing, electronics, telecommunication
systems, computers, and so on. Humans, in working to better the “human
condition,” have drastically changed the world. They have also
substantially improved the quality of life for a great many people.
I
have a specific interest in computer technology and its contributions
to technology in many other disciplines. My Web Page What the Future is
Bringing Us (
http://iae-pedia.org/What_the_Future_is_Bringing_Us)
provides a large number of forecasts for technology in the next few
years. My free book Planning, Forecasting, and Inventing Your
Computers-in-Education Future (
http://i-a-e.org/eBooks/cat_view/37-free-ebooks-by-dave-moursund.html) provides some methodology for making forecasts and some general forecasts for computer technology in education.
Most
of the forecasts listed on the What the Future is Bringing Us are
relatively short term—a few years up to perhaps 20 years. Forecasts of
up to approximately five years are typically based on working that is
currently being done in development and manufacturing and tend to be
relatively accurate. Longer term forecasts tend to depend on continues
success in basic research and materials science developments, and are
more speculative.
Thus, for example, consider the following forecast:
CORDIS (June 2009). No more geeky glasses to watch 3D. Retrieved 6/13/09:
http://cordis.europa.eu/ictresults/index.cfm?section=news&tpl=article&BrowsingType=Features&ID=90639. Quoting from the article:
Most
people’s experience with 3D involves wearing tinted glasses in a
cinema. But a new technology, which does not require glasses and may
enable 3DTV, is being developed by European researchers.
While
the first applications of the new technology are likely to be the
fields of industry and science, there are also very major implications
for the future of entertainment, both at the cinema and on television,
as well as in video gaming.
Suppose that we eventually have
relatively inexpensive 3D television. Does this make any difference in
what preservice and inservice teachers should currently be learning
about technology? Consumers readily adsorb this type of technological
progress. You don’t have to go to school to learn to watch ordinary TV,
HDTV, or 3DTV.
However, consider the following article:
This
article discusses shortcomings of current computer storage media. The
storage devices we now use tend to have a life expectancy of 10–30
years, and many are quite fragile. The article discusses new technology
that might provide both much large storage capacity and storage that
might last up to a billion years. What should preservice and inservice
teachers learn about increasingly larger and more reliable storage
capacity?
Final Remarks
Most of the responses that Tammy Vaught received did not focus on the
big pictures of what has long term-value in education. The storage
topic mentioned above provides an excellent example. Preservice and
inservice teachers need to know the how fragile current storage
technology. They need to know about doing regular backups of the
material that they and their students are developing and/or preserving
for future use. They need to know educational implications and uses of
providing all students with easy and routine access to a virtual
library that is far larger than today’s largest physical libraries.
Teachers
do not need to know small details of the latest and greatest storage
devices. Such progress is much like progress toward 3DTV—consumers can
readily learn to use such new devices without benefit of instruction in
school.
Here is what I would say to Tammy Vaught. Do not focus
on the “latest and greatest bells and whistles.” Look for general ideas
that are apt to be important for a very long time. For example, what
problems can computers now solve in the various disciplines that the
teachers will teach? What are current practical examples of widely
available computer technology that can solve such problems, and how
should this be affecting curriculum content, instructional processes,
and assessment? What are Artificial Intelligence and Computational
Thinking, and how do they fit into the questions just asked?
Here
is another piece of my answer. All preservice and inservice teachers
are already familiar with use of various search engines. These change
(improve) over time. How does a significant change or a new search
engine such as Wolfram Alphas (
http://www.wolframalpha.com/)
affect informal and formal education—and what teachers and students
should be doing? This trend toward more powerful and more intelligent
search engines is a very important component of a good education for
all teachers.
About Information Age
Education, Inc.
Information Age Education is a non-profit organization
dedicated to
improving education for learners of all ages throughout the world. IAE
is a project of the Science Factory, a 501(c)(3) science and technology
museum located in Eugene, Oregon. Current IAE activities include a Wiki
with address http://IAE-pedia.org,
a Website containing free books and articles at http://I-A-E.org, and the
free newsletter you are now reading.
To subscribe to this twice-a-month free newsletter and to see back
issues, go to http://i-a-e.org/iae-newsletter.html.
To change your address or cancel your subscription, click on the
“Manage your Subscription” link at the bottom of this e-mail message.